Project:
| Goal : |
Development of the macrosegregation
module within a metallurgy oriented software for solidification
processes. |
| Method : |
Solve the conservation equations
for energy, mass, momentum and solute using finite elements based
on an adaptive domain decomposition method with different
grid-refinement
levels. Apply the method to solidification problems in order to
simulate
macrosegregation phenomena such as freckles. |
| Advisor : |
Prof. M. Rappaz |
| pdf : |
the pdf-version
(4.4MB), paper version from EPFL
|
Abstract:
A numerical method for the simulation of
buoyancy-induced
macrosegregation during solidification processes is presented.
The physical model is based on volume averaged conservation equations
for
energy, mass, momentum, and solute, which are coupled using linearized
phase
diagram data for binary alloys, a temperature-enthalpy relationship,
and
the lever rule as a microsegregation model.
The numerical model considers two different length-scales, on the one
hand,
the scale of the overall process, on the other, a small critical zone
near
the solidification front where solutal inhomogeneities are initiated
and
the fluid velocity is non-zero.
A domain decomposition method (DDM) using two adapted grids has been
developed.
The overall computational domain is discretized using a `coarse' finite
element
mesh adapted to the process scale. At each time step, the energy
conservation
equation is solved on this discretization and new values of temperature
and
solid fraction are calculated at each finite element node. Based on
these
values, the computational domain is divided into three subdomains: the
so-called
solid, mushy, and liquid regions. The mushy subdomain corresponds to
the
critical zone near the solidification front and is adaptively
discretized
with a finer finite element mesh, whereas the liquid domain uses the
initial
coarse grid and the solid is no longer considered. The fluid flow and
solute
transport equations are solved alternately in the mushy and liquid
subdomains
on the corresponding finite element grids. For these computations, the
Galerkin
least squares (GLS) method is used to stabilize the Navier-Stokes
equations.
The coupling of the mushy and liquid subproblems is achieved with a
Dirichlet-Neumann
substructuring iterative method, together with the mortar technique to
deal
with the non-conforming discretizations at the subdomain
interfaces.
For the discretization in time, we use a finite difference method,
together
with a linearization procedure for the Navier-Stokes equations and
split
operators for the solute transport equation.
Using different test cases, with and without solidification or solute
transport,
the sensitivity of the numerical method with respect to the domain
decomposition
criterion and other numerical parameters is studied. Finally, the
method
is applied to several macrosegregation problems such as the
Hebditch-Hunt
test case, and the performances and limits of the approach are pointed
out
and discussed.
Introduction
Solutal variations in an alloy at the scale
of the process are known as macrosegregation and play an important
role in many solidification processes. It can be induced by deformation
of the solid skeleton in the semi-solid state, by transport of equiaxed
grains or by fluid flow in the mushy zone which redistributes
segregated
solute elements within the remaining liquid volume [1].
In order to simulate this last phenomenon in an efficient and accurate
way, it is necessary to take into account two different length scales:
on the one hand, the relatively small region of the mushy zone where
the fluid can penetrate and transport away solute and, on the other
hand, the characteristic size of the process.
In order to simulate this last phenomenon in an efficient and accurate
way, it is necessary to take into account two different length scales:
on the one hand, the relatively small region of the mushy zone where
the fluid can penetrate and transport away solute and, on the other
hand From a numerical point of view, this implies that a finer
discretization is needed close to the liquidus. In the present
contribution, a finite element approach is used. This has the advantage
over structured
finite volume or finite difference methods that complex geometries
can be described with fewer nodes. However, it becomes necessary
to refine the elements in the region where gradients of solute and
velocity are large in order to keep the errors within reasonable
bounds.
Adaptive meshing is a possibility, implying refining and coarsening
algorithms. Since this is difficult to achieve in 3D, an other method
has been chosen in the present study. It is based on a multidomain
approach [2].
The computational domain for the fluid flow and solute transport
equations is divided into two subdomains, the liquid region where a
fixed coarse grid is used, and the critical zone of the mushy region
where a fine, dynamic discretization is applied at each time step.
The equations to be solved with these grids are the conservation
equations for heat, mass, momentum and solute, averaged over a volume
element which is small with respect to the extent of the mushy zone
and large with respect to the typical dendrite arm spacing [3,4].
Physical model
Average conservation equations for energy,
mass, momentum and solute are used. The main hypotheses are
Furthermore, microsegregation is assumed
to occur with the lever rule and a constant partition coefficient
is used for the computation of the temperature, volume fraction of
solid and mass fraction of solute.
Discretization and method
The coupled system of partial differential
equations is solved as follows. At each time step, the heat equation
is solved at the macroscopic level, thus giving the position of the
mushy zone where the refinement has to be made. The fluid flow and the
solute conservation equations are then solved on both the coarse and
fine grids:
Figure 1: Schematic view of the DDM
resolution method
for the fluid flow and solute transport equations. A substructuring
iterative
method is used.
Results
Grid refinement
The fine discretization within the critical zone around the liquidus is
generated
automatically and is adaptive in time.

Figure 2: Temperature field during continuous
casting
with superimposed fine grid around the liquidus at different stages of
the
computation. See also the animated gif.
Fluid flow
In order to validate the DDM method for the fluid flow computation,
several
test cases have been considered. For example, natural convection within
a
partially solidified cavity. The computed velocity fields obtained by
the
DDM method have been compared to the results of a standard FE method.

Figure 3: Schematic view and
snapshot
of a partially solidified cavity with imposed, constant thermal
gradient.
Due to buoyancy forces, a velocity field is generated.
Figure 4: Velocity profiles along the
horizontal
midsection of the cavity and at time 200s in the overall domain (left)
and
the refined region (right) for the standard FE method on a 32x32
discretization
compared with the results obtained by the DDM method with one and two
refinements
in the critical zone.
Macrosegregation
Several macrosegregation computations have been performed:
- The method has been validated with the Hebditch-Hunt
macrosegregation
experiment [4].
- Segregation in a solidifying channel has been computed.
- Computations showing Freckles formation have been done.
Figure 5: Freckles formation: Solid fraction
(blue)
and the velocity field ahead of the solidification front (left) when an
instability
developpes. The adaptive fine discretization which is created in the
critical
zone is shown on the right. See also the animated gif.
Figure 6: Freckles formation: The segregation
map
after the formation of a channel segregate.
CPU time
By using the DDM technique in order to
refine
only the important zone close to the liquidus line, good accuracy is
achieved
while reducing the computational cost by about one order of magnitude.
Figure: Comparison of the CPU time
necessary
to compute 200 time-steps for a standard FE method with a 32x32
grid
(1), the DDM method on the 32x32 grid with 1 refinement (2) and 2
refinements
(3) close to the mushy zone, and for the standard FE method with the
128x128
discretization. The number of nodal points for the discretizations is
also
indicated.
References
[1] Voller, V.R., Sundarraj, S., Int. J. Heat
Mass Transfer, Vol. 38, 1995, pp. 1009-18
[2] Quarteroni, A., Valli, A., Domain
Decomposition
Methods for Partial Differential Equations, Oxford Science
Publications,
1999
[3] Rappaz, M., Voller, V., Metall. Trans. A,
vol. 21 A, 1990, pp. 749-53
[4] Ahmad, N., Combeau, H., Desbiolles, J.-L., Jalanti,
T., Lesoult, G., Rappaz, J., Rappaz, M., Stomp, C., Metall. Mater.
Trans. A, vol. 29A, 1998, pp. 617-30
Publications
[2003] Kaempfer, Th. U. and Rappaz, M.,Modelling of
macrosegregation during solidification processes using an adaptive
domain decomposition method,
Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 11(2003), pp. 575-597
[2002] Kaempfer, Th. U., Modeling of Macrosegregation
Using
an Adaptive Domain Decomposition Method, Thesis No 2666 (2002),
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015
Lausanne,
Switzerland
[2000] Kaempfer, Th. U. and Rappaz, M., Modeling
of Casting, Welding and Advanced Solidification Processes, IX,
ed. P. R. Sahm, P. N. Hansen, J. G. Conley, Shaker Verlag, Aachen,
Germany, 2000, pp. 641-647
[1999] Kaempfer, Th. U. and Rappaz, M., Journees
d'automne 1999 de la SF2M, Revue de Metallurgie, Societe Francaise
de Metallurgie et de Materiaux, Les Fontenelles, Nanterre, France,
1999, p. 131